In digital systems, communication between devices is essential. Microcontrollers like AVR use both serial and parallel methods to transfer data between internal modules or external devices such as sensors, computers, or other controllers. Understanding the difference between these communication types helps in designing efficient embedded systems. This article explains serial vs parallel communication, simplex and duplex transmission, and the differences between asynchronous and synchronous communication — all key topics in AVR serial port programming.
Serial vs Parallel Communication
In **parallel communication**, multiple bits are transmitted simultaneously using multiple data lines. For example, an 8-bit parallel system needs 8 wires to send 8 bits at once. It provides high-speed data transfer but is more expensive and prone to signal interference over long distances.
In **serial communication**, data is sent one bit at a time over a single line. It is slower compared to parallel but requires fewer connections and is suitable for long-distance transmission.
(8-bit bus)
(1-bit line)
Advantages and Limitations
Parallel communication is faster for short distances (like inside microcontrollers or memory devices), whereas serial communication is ideal for long distances (like USB, UART, or RS232).
Simplex, Half Duplex and Full Duplex Communication
Communication between two devices can occur in one or both directions, depending on the type of system used:
1. Simplex Communication
Data flows only in one direction — from transmitter to receiver. The receiver cannot send any response back.
Example: Keyboard to CPU communication.
2. Half Duplex Communication
Data can flow in both directions, but not at the same time. Devices take turns to send and receive data.
Example: Walkie-talkie communication.
3. Full Duplex Communication
Data can flow in both directions simultaneously. Both transmitter and receiver can send and receive data at the same time using separate lines.
Example: UART communication between PC and microcontroller.
Asynchronous vs Synchronous Communication
The difference between asynchronous and synchronous communication depends on how timing is maintained between transmitter and receiver.
Asynchronous Communication
In asynchronous mode, there is no shared clock signal between sender and receiver. Each character is sent with a **start bit** and **stop bit** to indicate when transmission begins and ends. Both sides must use the same baud rate for accurate communication. This is the most common mode used in AVR USART.
Synchronous Communication
In synchronous mode, both devices share a **common clock line** that synchronizes data transmission. This mode allows faster and continuous data transfer without start and stop bits but requires extra hardware lines.
Practical Use in AVR
The AVR microcontroller supports both modes through its USART module. Most embedded systems prefer **asynchronous mode** for UART-based communication like Bluetooth, GSM, and PC serial links. **Synchronous mode** is useful for high-speed connections or when precise timing is needed.
Difference Table
| Feature | Asynchronous Communication | Synchronous Communication |
|---|---|---|
| Clock Signal | No common clock; uses start and stop bits. | Uses a shared clock line between devices. |
| Speed | Slower due to extra bits for synchronization. | Faster and more efficient data transfer. |
| Hardware Lines | Requires only TX and RX lines. | Requires TX, RX, and Clock line. |
| Synchronization | Self-synchronized using start/stop bits. | Externally synchronized using clock pulses. |
| Example | UART communication with PC. | SPI or synchronous USART communication. |
Conclusion
Serial communication simplifies data exchange using fewer wires, making it ideal for modern embedded systems. Understanding its classification — serial vs parallel, simplex vs duplex, and asynchronous vs synchronous — is crucial for designing reliable microcontroller interfaces. In AVR microcontrollers, asynchronous serial communication via USART is most commonly used, offering a perfect balance between simplicity, reliability, and hardware efficiency.
Comments
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]